My article from today's Algona Upper Des Moines about the Ascension:
Q: If the Bible says that Jesus ascended into Heaven after He rose from the dead, why do we always hear it said that He is present with us now?
The Bible tells us that Jesus died on a Friday afternoon, but rose to life again on Sunday morning. After He rose from the dead, He appeared to hundreds of people, including His disciples, over the course of the next 40 days (Luke 24, John 20-21). On the fortieth day, while Jesus was talking with His disciples, “He began to be lifted up, and a cloud hid Him from their sight.” (Acts 1:9) Several New Testament passages also speak of Jesus as having ascended into Heaven and that He is “seated at the right hand of God the Father…” as many Christians confess in the Apostles’ Creed.
In other places, Jesus promises that He will be with His disciples and all Christians. He says, “Behold, I am with you always, to the end of the age.” (Matthew 28:20). He also promises, “where two or three are gathered in my name, there am I among them.” (Matthew 18:20) When the apostle Paul writes letters to churches in the New Testament, He often includes a blessing which says that God will be with those who read the letter. (Sometimes He says Jesus, other times God, Lord, or the Holy Spirit.)
On one hand, the Gospels and the book of Acts clearly teach that Jesus did ascend into Heaven. On the other hand, Jesus’ own words, as well as the letters of Paul clearly teach that God will be with Christians until Jesus comes again on the last day. How can these both be true?
We know that God is present everywhere. In Jeremiah 23:24, God says, “’Can anyone hide in secret places so that I cannot see him? …Do I not fill heaven and earth?’” Since Jesus is God, He is present in all times and places, but when He makes the promises mentioned above, He is talking specifically to His followers, not to all people. The fact that God is present everywhere is the same for all people whether they follow Jesus or not. The presence Jesus is promising is something special that is not true for the rest of the world.
Sometimes when we are apart from a friend or family member, they say that they are with us in Spirit, and we often speak of deceased loved ones as being with us in our memory. Here, though, Jesus is promising far more than that we will remember Him or that he will be with us “in spirit.” Before Jesus died, He promised His disciples that after He had risen, He would send the Holy Spirit to guide them and remind them of the things He had said (John 14-16), and just before He ascended, He again promised to send the Holy Spirit (Acts 2:8).
Whenever we read or hear the Bible, (or remember what we have read from it, or hear a friend talking about Jesus, hear a song which talks about Him, etc.) God sends the Holy Spirit, through whom Jesus becomes supernaturally present with us.
Furthermore, on the night before He was crucified, Jesus took bread and said, “This is my body.” Then He took wine and said, “This is my blood.” He then instructed His disciples to keep on doing this in remembrance of Him. Whenever Christians participate in the Lord’s Supper (a.k.a. Communion or Eucharist), Jesus body and blood become present in a special way among them. Since Jesus is both God and human, even His human body can be present all over the world at the same time.
When we go about our day, Jesus is present with us, just as He is with every person, but for Christians, Jesus comes to us in an extraordinary way through the God’s Word, the Bible, and when we take part in Lord’s Supper.
Readers are encouraged to submit questions for inclusion in future issues. According to your preference, you may include your first name or submit questions anonymously, and I will do my best to answer your questions as my knowledge and research allow and according to their suitability for publication. You may submit questions by email to revjpeterson@yahoo.com or by mail to P.O. Box 195; Burt, IA 50522.
At times in Christian thought, the priorities of pure doctrine and passionate mission have been perceived as opposites on a spectrum where emphasis on one results in neglect of the other, but without one, the other is deficient and doomed to crumble. Mission without doctrine is like a body without a skeleton, but apart from mission, doctrine is like dry bones in a museum. A Lutheran Reformission maintains a dual emphasis, resulting in doctrinal missions as well as missional doctrine.
Thursday, June 18, 2009
Thursday, June 4, 2009
The Sacraments
My article from today's Algona Upper Des Moines about the Sacraments:
Q: Why do Lutherans and Catholics
have a different number of Sacraments?
Do other Christian denominations share the concept of Sacrament?
In general, there are three
conclusions among Christians regarding the number of Sacraments. Some conclude that there are seven. Others conclude that there are two, and still
others conclude that there are none. The
differences between Christians regarding the number of Sacraments are largely a
result of their different definitions of what a Sacrament is.
Roman Catholics consider the seven
Sacraments to be, Baptism, Confirmation, Eucharist, Penance, Anointing of the
Sick, Holy Orders, and Matrimony. The Catechism of the Catholic Church defines
Sacraments as, “efficacious signs of grace, instituted by Christ and entrusted
to the Church, by which divine life is dispensed to us.” In addition to Roman Catholics, Episcopal and
Eastern Orthodox churches generally agree with this list of seven
Sacraments.
In contrast, Lutherans consider a
Sacrament to be a sacred act, instituted by God Himself, using a visible
element which is combined with God’s Word to give forgiveness for sins. Based on this definition, Lutherans usually
conclude that there are two Sacraments, which are Baptism and the Lord’s Supper
(a.k.a. Communion or Eucharist). Like
Catholics, Lutherans also perform Confirmation, Marriage, and Absolution
(somewhat like Penance), although they do not call them Sacraments. Most Lutherans also ordain their pastors and
some practice Anointing of the Sick, although, again, not as Sacraments. The reason Lutherans do not consider these
latter five practices to be Sacraments is because they either do not have a
visible element (like water, bread, or wine), or because it is not said in the
Bible that they forgive sins. Most
churches of the Calvinist (Reformed or Presbyterian) and Methodist traditions
arrive at the same conclusion as Lutherans regarding the number of the
Sacraments, although they do so for different reasons.
A third group of churches have significantly
different beliefs regarding the Sacraments from those churches already
mentioned. The statements of belief
written by most Baptists and Pentecostals, as well as many independent or
nondenominational congregations, do not list any Sacraments. They do still make use of Baptism and the
Lord’s Supper, but they see them as symbolic acts of devotion to God which are
done by Christians, rather than God’s actions to forgive sins. As a result of this belief, they use the word
Ordinance instead of Sacrament to emphasize this difference of belief. Some of these churches may also observe the
ordination of pastors and anoint the sick, but not as an ordinance or a
Sacrament.
All types of Christians continue to
keep Baptism and the Lord’s Supper as part of their practices, although there
are significant differences about what is happening there. All Christians still practice marriage, even
though not all consider it a Sacrament.
I think it could also be said that nearly all would agree that it is
good to pray for the sick (Anointing), ask God’s blessing on pastors
(Ordination), teach our beliefs to young people (Confirmation), and forgive
sins which are confessed (Penance or Absolution). The disagreement doesn’t seem to be whether these things
should be done, but rather what is really taking place, what it should be
called, and how it should be done.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)