Friday, January 29, 2010
My article from today's Algona Upper Des Moines about Jesus' appearance:
Q: How do we know what Jesus looked like? If we do not know what He looked like, is it appropriate to attempt make a picture or statue?
There are many characteristics which we have come to recognize as characterizing a picture of Jesus in our culture. Typically, we see Jesus portrayed with a light complexion and long hair, smooth skin, and a beard. There are often additional features which alert us to His identity, such as a praying posture or emanation of light, or that he is portrayed in the context of a Biblical story.
At the time Jesus lived, there were obviously no cameras or video recordings, and much of the art of that time did not survive until our present day. When we combine this lack of visual evidence with the fact that there is no description of Jesus physical appearance given in the Gospels, we are left to look for other sources for information.
The image we typically see today is based primarily on two sources. The first of these is ancient art made by Christians two or three centuries after Jesus’ resurrection. It is during this time period, the beard and long hair that we find so common in images of Jesus today became a standard feature.
The second of these sources is the Shroud of Turin, which is an ancient piece of cloth which bears the image of a man’s body. The legend concerning this item is that it was one of the burial cloths in which Jesus was wrapped when He was buried. It is held that when Jesus rose from the dead, the energy discharge in that event burned his image into the shroud. Even though these claims regarding the Shroud of Turin can neither be conclusively proven nor refuted, its image remains a primary source for modern depictions of the physical appearance of Jesus.
While no description of Jesus physical appearance is given in the Gospels, the Bible does give us several pieces of information that inform our knowledge of what Jesus would have looked like. In predicting the coming of the savior, Isaiah prophesies that Jesus would have “no form or majesty that we should look at him, and no beauty that we should desire him.” (Isaiah 53:2 ESV) In other words, He had the appearance of an ordinary man. This is further evidenced by the Pharisees and other people during His life who rejected His claims to be God.
We also know from the Bible that Jesus was Jewish. This means that recent depictions of Caucasian, African, Asian, and other ethnic portrayals of Jesus are certainly inaccurate. Instead, He would most likely have had an appearance more similar to lighter-complected residents of the modern-day Middle-east. Additionally, we know that Jesus’ stepfather Joseph was a construction worker and therefore, Jesus would have almost certainly followed in learning that trade until He began His ministry at age thirty. Because of the harsh work of building by hand with stone and rock, Jesus would have likely had a pronounced ruggedness not often seen in our depictions.
The final and most important feature revealed about Jesus in the Bible is that He continued to have the scars from His crucifixion, even after He rose from the dead. The most certain and obvious way to tell that a picture or statue portrays Jesus is to look for these marks. The statue in the front of my church has pronounced red markings on the hands and feet, leaving no doubt that it is intended to portray Jesus. This is a much more specific and clear way of indicating the figure is Jesus than any other.
Ultimately, there is no hard evidence regarding Jesus precise physical appearance, but if our depictions of his appearance are faithful to what we do know about Him from the Bible, instead of portraying Him the way that we would like Him to look, especially when they use clear signs such as the wounds of the crucifixion, then they have served their purpose. This is particularly true when we remember that we are not worshipping the statue or picture, but instead the risen Lord who sits at the right hand of the Father in Heaven.
Thursday, January 14, 2010
My article from today's Algona Upper Des Moines about graven images.
Q: Why do so many churches have pictures or statues of Jesus and other Biblical figures when in Exodus 20:4-5, the Bible says, “You shall not make for yourself any graven image or any likeness of anything that is in the heavens above or that is on the earth beneath, or that is in the water below the earth. You shall not bow down to them or serve them.”?
These verses, and their implications for the life of the Church have been a topic of discussion among Christians for most of the history of Christianity. They have been interpreted in a wide variety of ways throughout Christian history, and have been used as the basis for widely varying rules regarding the propriety of different types of ecclesiastical art.
For example, Eastern Orthodox Christians forbid any kind of free-standing, three-dimensional statues in their churches and their worship. They interpret these verses as only prohibiting statues, but not paintings, drawings, mosaics, carvings, or any other art that is not a free-standing statue. When Jesus is depicted, this interpretation even allows for this type of representation, called an icon, to be venerated—that is that the person can pray to God “through” the icon while not actually praying “to” it.
Many Christians in the tradition of John Calvin do not allow for any type of depiction of Jesus or God to exist in the spaces where they worship. Paintings or drawings of scenes from Bible stories are sometimes considered acceptable in one’s home, but are not considered appropriate in a worship space or for devotional use. Symbols, such as a cross or dove, are typically allowed, but in some very strict traditions, even these are avoided.
In Catholic and Lutheran traditions, three dimensional art depicting Jesus, and even the saints, is extremely common. In the Catholic tradition, these sculptures, particularly of Mary and Jesus, may even be treated in a worshipful manner with acts such as kneeling and bowing before them, especially if they are reported to be connected to a miraculous event. In Lutheran traditions, this is not the case, but in some circumstances Lutherans may bow toward the crucifix (a cross which includes a carving of Jesus’ body) out of respect for Jesus, but with the understanding that they are not worshipping the crucifix itself.
While the first look at this passage might seem to condemn many practices that occur in churches today, a closer look at the precise wording reveals that the meaning is much more precise than it might appear at first glance.
First, this passage addresses the depiction of created things “in the heavens above or that is on the earth beneath, or that is in the water below the earth.” Because God the Father and God the Holy Spirit are invisible, it would not be possible to depict them in art other than by symbol (such as a bright light for the Father or a dove for the Holy Spirit), and to do so should not be attempted. To depict Jesus in art during Old Testament times would have been similarly impossible, since He had not yet become man and therefore had not yet been seen. Today, however, Jesus has become man and has been seen. Since He is eternal God and not created, it would not be forbidden to depict Jesus.
Secondly, even though the prohibition in these verses includes depictions of created things, this prohibition only exists if they are to be worshipped. In many of the world’s religions, especially in ancient times, people would carve or shape a statue of a bird, animal, or mythical creature, and worship it, not just as a representation of an unseen god, but actually as their god.
To worship any created thing in place of the One True God would be idolatry, regardless whether it was a statue, a painting, or the real thing, but it is perfectly acceptable for Christians to own a statue of George Washington or the mascot of their favorite sports team, paintings of wildlife, or the portraits of their children, as long as they do not worship them. Likewise, a picture or statue of Jesus is not forbidden by God as long as it we do not worship it. The matter is not a question of what is depicted or how it is done, but rather it is a question of attempting to visibly portray the invisible God or to worship any created thing in place of God.
Readers are encouraged to submit questions for inclusion in future issues. You may submit questions by email to email@example.com or by mail to
P.O. Box 195; . Burt, IA 50522
Rev. Jason P. Peterson
– Burt St. John’s Lutheran Church