My article from this week's Algona Upper Des Moines regarding Gun Control:
Q: Is there a Christian position
regarding Gun control, and what principles would guide Christians in their
consideration of this question in our nation?
It is only very rarely that I
encounter someone who is neutral and has not formed an opinion on one side or
the other of this topic. Among
Christians, those on both sides of the issue seem to think that their opinion
is the same as God’s position on the matter.
As we consult the Bible on this
matter, it is important that we first recognize, as with many issues, firearms
were not present in Bible times. This is
the reason we will find no verse actually giving a definitive answer on this
subject. However, other forms of
weapons, such as swords, and questions regarding self-defense are addressed in
Christian ethics.
A tradition does exist within
Christianity called Pacifism. This
tradition holds that Christians should not engage in violence for any reason
even self-defense. The assumption here
is that God will defend the Christian if that is His will, and that if He does
not defend them, whatever does happen was His will.
Those who hold this position would
cite such things as Jesus’ admonition to “turn the other cheek” when slapped by
a rival or His warning to Peter that “those who live by the sword will also die
by the sword.”
While this tradition is primarily
found in small numbers, such as Quakers and certain monastic communities, there
has frequently been questioning among Christians about the propriety of
Christians engaging in warfare and other forms of violence, even for honorable
reasons such as military service to their nation.
The broader consensus over the course
of Christian history and among Christian ethicists, though, has been that
self-defense is a permissible Christian action, that military service is an
honorable Christian vocation, and that in some instances, such as a father
defending his family, a man is required to resist, even to the point of death
in defense of his wife, daughters, or others for whom he is responsible.
In this case, it would be contended
that Jesus’ admonition about turning the other cheek regards those who insult
or humiliate a person, and not those who pose a credible threat. They would point to scriptures such as Paul’s
instructions in Romans 13 to honor the government, which acknowledge that
governments “bear the sword” in God’s service and for the good of their
citizens.
With the exception of governmental
commands that require Christians to sin, it is the New Testament’s consistent
position that Christians are to obey their government and work for and within
good order in their societies. For
Americans, this means honoring the constitution to which our nation is
committed and upon which it is founded.
Whatever position Americans take, it ought to honor the constitutional
protections provided or to work only through lawful means to amend them to fit
present circumstances.
Ultimately, we cannot say that there
is a single, universal, Christian position on gun control. This is not an issue where we are deciding
between sin and righteousness, but rather one where we are faced with the
contrast between wise and unwise action.
In such cases, different Christians will be equally convinced in their
own positions. I firmly believe in the
wisdom of one side of this argument, but another Christian might believe firmly
in the wisdom of the opposite stance, and in the end, there is not a Biblical
command as to which of us is right or wrong.
The Christian’s concern in such
circumstances would not be for defending his own position or his own
self-interest, but instead to work in the interest of enacting the wisest
possible solution within the boundaries set by the laws and constitution of the
nation.