My article from this week's Algona Upper Des Moines about Karma:
Q: Does Christianity believe in
Karma? How does Christianity believe
peoples actions toward one another are rewarded and punished in this
world?
Karma is an idea that originates in
East-Asian religions like Hinduism and Buddhism. Their understanding of both time and life
is one of repeating cycles rather than the linear progression that we in the
western world understand. So, while we
illustrate the passage of time with timelines of history, they would draw a
shape resembling a coiled spring that wraps back on itself.
Part of this understanding includes
reincarnation, which is the belief that souls are repeatedly born into a series
of lives over the course of time. Karma
carries the result that those who do good in one life will advance in the next
while those who do evil will regress in the next life. Many in these religions also believe that
Karma also influences events within lives.
This means that those who do what is
right in this life would receive good fortune in return while those who do evil
in this life would suffer loss or tragedy in return. These karmic responses are not seen as being
guided by a personal god, but rather an impersonal universe which seeks to keep
balance by repaying actions with consequences in kind.
While such an understanding might
seem quite sensible on its surface, such ideas are completely foreign to a
Christian understanding of things. When
Jesus’ disciples encountered a man who had been born blind, they asked whether
it was he or his parents who had committed a sin to cause such a thing to
occur. Jesus clearly denies that any
such thing is true, saying that neither was the cause of his blindness.
Even though sometimes sinful or
unwise behavior has natural consequences, Christianity does not understand any
system, with or without the guidance of God, which repays them in this
life. Instead, the unanimous witness of
Scripture is that earthly tragedies are a result of sin in the world. However, this is not a correspondence of one
sin or one person’s sin to certain consequences. Instead, the Bible portrays earthly suffering
as the consequences broken by the collective weight of human sin.
For Christianity, there are
consequences to sinful behavior that go beyond the natural results of the
action, but these consequences are eternal rather earthly, and complete rather
than proportional—any deviation from perfection deserves eternal death and
punishment in hell.
Rewards in Christianity are likewise
opposite to the idea of karma.
Christianity sees no ability in humans to earn rewards from God. Because they fail to achieve perfection, they
fail the test of God’s law.
Instead, rewards are received by the
Christian based on Jesus’ performance rather than their own. Whoever trusts in Jesus’ is promised to be
rewarded on the basis of His perfect record which replaces their own. These rewards are received as a gift rather
than earned, and like the punishments deserved for sin, they are only realized
in eternity.
While trust in Jesus has benefits in
this world such as peace with God and relief from the anxiety of relying on the
uncertainties of our imperfect efforts in relation to God, these benefits are
secondary to the primary reward of resurrected life with Jesus that will be
initiated on the Last Day and continue without end.
Karma is ultimately the complete
opposite of the Christian understanding of rewards and punishments—both because
it relies on a different basis (human performance vs. divine gift) and because it
awards them in this life or subsequent lives rather than in an eternity which
commences following only a single life in this world.