Q: Why do some churches say creeds
during their worship services? Isn’t
believing in these creeds a way of adding onto the Bible? If a church requires adherence to any
document other than the Bible, isn’t that against the Reformation principle of
“Scripture Alone” that protestants claim to believe?
There are many forms of creeds found
throughout Christianity. The three that
are almost-universally accepted, and which many churches speak publically as a
part of public worship are the Apostles’ Creed, Nicene Creed, and Athanasian
Creed. The Apostles’ Creed is typically
associated with Baptism and with the prayer offices of the Church. The Nicene Creed is typically associated with
the Lord’s Supper, and the Athanasian Creed, the longest and most complicated
of the three, is traditionally said on occasions specifically associated with
the doctrine of the Trinity, such as the first Sunday after Pentecost.
During the first 400 years after
Jesus ascended into heaven, representatives from all of Christianity met seven
times in response to false teachings that had arisen. They gathered in council to evaluate these
new teachings and responded by formulating statements of what was true, based
on the writings of the Apostles, which we know as the New Testament. These three creeds are the result of the
councils mentioned above, and from that point until the founding of the United
States over 1300 years later, they were considered the standard for Christian
orthodoxy. If anyone agreed with these
creeds, even if they disputed other teachings of the Church, they were
considered within the scope of Christianity, and if anyone disagreed with
elements of these creeds, they were considered outside the scope of
Christianity.
This is true to such an extent that
my Lutheran predecessors emphasized their consistency with historical
Christianity by including them as the first documents in their collection of
statements about what they as a group believed in comparison to their Roman
Catholic and Reformed neighbors of the time.
To confess these creeds, whether as
foundation for one’s written doctrine, or as a public act of worship, is not a
way of adding onto the Bible, though.
This is because these creeds are summaries of what is contained in the
Bible. In fact, fragments of these
creeds can be seen already in the letters of the Apostle Paul, as he quotes
them as evidence for which doctrine is true or false in the congregations he is
addressing.
The reason these creeds are necessary
is because throughout the history of Christianity, people have frequently
misunderstood the message of the Bible, and as a result, strayed from the
truth. These creeds serve as a succinct
and time-tested way to begin instructing new Christians in the faith, so that
as they begin to read the Bible, they can “stand on the shoulders of those who
have gone before them” as these foundational statements undergird their
personal reading, as well as an easily-memorized way that Christians can test
the statements of unknown teachers against established truth to judge whether
the teacher in question ought to be believed.
In the centuries since these creeds,
the tradition of summarizing the doctrines of churches in a written statement
has continued with documents such as the
Book of Concord among Lutherans
and the “Westminster Confession” and the “Canons of the Synod of Dort” among
protestants.
However, this is not to say that
these creeds or other confessions are to be considered equal to the Bible. Instead, they are always subject to what is
taught in the Bible, and derive their authority from the Bible.
At the same time, the three major
creeds listed at the beginning of this article are not merely examples of what
Christians have believed in the past.
Instead, they are statements of timeless truth which reflect the essence
and foundation of Christian teaching. Since
God Himself does not change, neither does His Truth, and since these creeds
reflect and embody that Truth as revealed in the Bible, they themselves remain
true for all time, regardless of the changes in human opinion and perspective
which may have occurred in the generations since.
No comments:
Post a Comment