My article from this week's newspapers responds to a question about excommunication:
Q: What is excommunication, and
what are the implications if a church has excommunicated a person?
Although the term excommunication
might initially evoke mental images that resemble an Amish shunning or a scene
from the Scarlet Letter, the reality is much less dramatic and much less common
than many might imagine.
Christians believe a person is saved
as a gift from God because of the crucifixion of Jesus for them. All who trust that this sacrifice forgives
their sins confess them – that is they agree with God’s law concerning their
actions – and receive God’s forgiveness.
This occurs privately between the person and God, as well as being
spoken corporately in the services of many types of churches, and in some
traditions also occurs privately between the person and his pastor or
priest.
While many sins are known only to the
sinner and to God, occasionally a sin becomes known to a person’s pastor or
their fellow Christians, who may need to confront them regarding that sin. When the person who has committed the sin
agrees with God’s law about his actions, he receives forgiveness. In such a case, his pastor and fellow
Christians would not have further concerns about his spiritual condition, even
though it may still be necessary to provide counsel and support to help him
overcome any inclinations to return to that particular sin.
However, when a member is confronted
with a sin and either denies its sinfulness or disregards its sinfulness,
concern about his spiritual condition quickly intensifies. In Matthew 18, Jesus instructs His disciples
that if the correction of one person does not convince the person they ought to
take along 2 or 3 people with authority in the church and confront him
again. If after this second intervention
the person still defends his sin, Jesus says to take the matter before the
whole church to plead with him, following which he is to be excluded as long as
he does not repent.
Paul instructs the Corinthians in his
first letter to them to do this regarding a particular man in their
congregation who is involved in an illicit intimate relationship with his
step-mother, saying to “Expel the evil person from among you.” But, contrary to what many first impressions
might be, this is not an effort to keep the congregation pure by removing
sinners. Instead, it is intended as a
method by which the unrepentant would be guided to recognize their sin. Paul makes this clear when he says, “you must
deliver this man over to Satan… that his spirit might be saved in the day of
the Lord.”
Similarly it is not done in order to
place condemnation onto the man, but rather to recognize the fact that he has
already separated himself from God’s forgiveness by refusing to acknowledge his
sin. Jesus reflects this same
understanding when He assigns His disciples the task of forgiving and
withholding sins in John 20, saying, “If you forgive the sins of any, they have
already been forgiven them; if you withhold forgiveness, it has already been
withheld.”
Many traditions prefer the term
Church Discipline rather than Excommunication to refer to this process, because
it emphasizes the intended result that the person be restored to the
congregation rather than the method that they are placed outside the church’s
fellowship. Correspondingly, a public
removal from the congregation is not the only form of church discipline.
Instead, on some occasions, a pastor
might privately exclude the individual from the Lord’s Supper in the
congregation because of the danger of doing spiritual harm to them, according
to Paul’s warnings in 1 Corinthians 10-11 against receiving Communion while
unrepentant. On some occasions, this is
a first step before formal removal from the congregation, but frequently it
results in the restoration of the person to a repentant and forgiven status
without proceeding to bring them before the congregation for removal.
Regardless of the procedure by which
this is achieved, the goal is the same – restoration of the sinner to the
reception of the Lord’s forgiveness.
While such a practice might appear intolerant to the world outside of
the Church, it is done as a matter of responsible spiritual care, in order to
avoid the most dreadful consequence that a Christian would abandon His Lord’s
forgiveness in favor of defending and embracing his own sinful acts.
No comments:
Post a Comment